Showing posts with label johan norberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label johan norberg. Show all posts

06 August 2010

Barnarbete kan stoppas!!

GP - Barnarbete kan stoppas
"Coop köper varor från omkring 1 300 fabriker i Sydostasien. Flest fabriker finns i Kina, men affärer görs i fler länder. Arbetsmiljö och arbetsvillkor i dessa följs upp.


En del av detta redovisas i företagets hållbarhetsredovisning. I nio av tio fabriker har man upptäckt olika brister i arbetsmiljön, anställda jobbar länge, misstanke om tvångsarbete förekommer och barnarbete har avslöjats. Med de fabriker som inte fyller kraven bryts affärerna, i andra följer man upp förbättringsarbete som behöver göras. Så agerar ett företag som vill ta ansvar"
--------
Ansvar, vilket ansvar? Det enda ansvar de har är att göra en fet vinst och ge oss billiga grejor! Och det säger sig själv att vuxna arbetare är både dyrare och jobbigare att ha att göra med än barnarbetare. De strejkar ju och svänger sig med svåra ord som "Corporate Social Responsibility" och ska ha lön och sånt.

Nej jag håller med Johan Norberg;
"I am the advocate of socially irresponsible corporations. When a friend of mine saw on my web site that I was going to give a speech with the title “Why corporations shouldn’t be socially responsible” he was shocked."


I believe in the freedom of corporations and consumers to make their own decisions.

Om jag hade haft ett stort företag hade jag också flyttat iväg från den svenska fackmaffian till Asien och ställd inför valet mellan en dyr jobbig fackansluten och en liten timid tioårig asiatiska är ju valet självklart!


Coop-varor och barnarbete

19 August 2008

Vinnaren!

Johan Norberg verkar känna sig lite lurad av den kinesiska regeringen och olympiska kommittén;
Hosting the Olympic Games would make China more open claimed Chinese officials and the International Olympic Committee.

Det var ju många naiva vänsterliberaler som trodde att kina skulle bli demokratiskt bara för att väst flyttar all tillverkningsindustri dit. Hö hö hö!

Poängen var ju istället att fly långt bort från miljökrav, höga skatter och jobbiga fackföreningsmaffiosos och låta kinesiska slavarbetare göra jobbet för en spottstyver (då är diktatur en klar fördel) och sen låta vinsterna åka på semester till lämpligt skatteparadis med mutade kinesiska tjänstemäns goda minne.

McKina äger!



T o m Naomi Klein erkänner att Kina is tha shit;
"China, by any traditional capitalist measures, is by far the most successful capitalist economy - ten percent growth rates per year. And it has done this in a climate of enormous repression. It is a Stalinist style police state, which is increasing its level of repression as we speak. "

Ett vinnande koncept!


08 August 2008

Googles nakenchock!

Den globalt hyllade och världsberömde nyliberale debattören och författaren Johan Norberg är ju, som alla vet, långt mer världsberömd och omskriven än den notoriskt konspiratoriska och skandalösa vänsterpropagandisten Naomi Klein!

Men av någon anledning verkar Google manipulera sökresultaten på ett skandalöst sätt och Johan Norberg får bara en bråkdel av det utrymme de ger den notoriskt skandalösa, konspiratoriska vänsterextremisten Naomi Klein.


20 January 2008

Amazing Discovery!

"There might be 600 million more people living in extreme poverty around the world than we thought."
Johan Norberg

AB1 AB2

19 December 2007

Avklädningschock för Johan Norberg

Från Johan Norbergs recension av "Chockdoktrinen"

"Naomi Klein för till torgs en väldigt ny och annorlunda konspirationsteori som går ut på att demonstranterna på Himmelska Fridens torg dom var egentligen drivna av motvilja mot de ekonomiska liberala reformerna.
Och Deng Xiaoping angrep dom,sköt ner dom, körde över dom därför att att han ville försvara sina reformer.
Det är ett avsnitt som är REN,DIREKT HISTORIEFÖRFALSKNING "

"Well, you should check my facts, just like you should have checked Klein´s and her reviewers´ (why didn´t you?). Just go ahead. And let me know exactly what´s wrong if you find something. General skepticism isn´t enough."

---------------------
Wang Hui synar Johan Norbergs faktafel:

"For Wang, the problems associated with China’s uneven development were first identified by the demonstrators in Tiananmen Square in 1989. Wang himself was one of the last protesters to leave the square on the morning of June 4, 1989, as the tanks of the People’s Liberation Army closed in. Normally rather brisk and matter-of-fact, he grew animated as he described in fluent, if occasionally idiosyncratic, English how a “broad social movement” began to grow out of the distress caused by the shock therapy of market reforms.

On the night of June 3, when the tanks and armored cars charged through Beijing, killing hundreds of unarmed resisters and injuring thousands more, Wang was among those assembled in the center of Tiananmen Square. He could hear the gunfire, but some of the more radical among the students still refused to leave.

About 200 million of the rural population are crowding the cities and towns in search of low-paying jobs. More than four million Chinese participated in the 87,000 protests recorded in 2005, and these statistics may not fully convey the rage and discontent of Chinese living with one of the world’s highest income inequalities and deteriorating health and education systems, as well as the arbitrary fees and taxes imposed by local party officials. Much of this, Wang said, could be laid at the feet of the “right-wing radicals” or neoliberal economists who cite Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek (advocates of unregulated markets who inspired Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher in the 80’s) and who argue for China’s integration into the global economy without taking into account the social price of mass privatization. And it is they, Wang added, who have held favor with the ruling elite and have dominated the state-run media."
China’s New Leftist

Vilken kommunistpropaganda!

DN1 Dn2 DN3 Aftonbladet Johan Norberg Timbro Hax

12 December 2007

Globaliseringsrådet is Johan Norberg IV

"Tänk om allt vore så bra som Johan Norberg skriver på SvD Brännpunkt 25/11 (”76000 färre fattiga varje dag”). Världen blir allt rikare, färre dör i förtid och miljöproblemen löser sig bara vi blir ännu rikare.

Artikeln – som bygger på Norbergs rapport till Globaliseringsrådet – är späckad med statistik, vilket är förrädiskt därför att en del är sant.

Annat är halvsant därför att han har valt ut just sådana fakta eller tidsperioder som passar hans syfte, att likt Voltaires Pangloss försöka övertyga oss att vi lever i den bästa av världar.

Men då måste både Norberg och Pangloss också blunda för mycket.

I Norbergs värld lyfts 76000 människor varje dag ur fattigdomen. Visst, det stämmer om man väljer fem speciella år och Världsbankens ena, extrema definition av fattigdom, att bara ha en dollar om dagen.

Med dess andra definition, två dollar per dag, har inte antalet fattiga minskat på 25 år. De är fortfarande ungefär två och en halv miljarder.

Andelen har krympt från 67 till 48 procent, men det finns lika många fattiga. Trots att världen har blivit nästan dubbelt så rik."

Globaliseringsrådet is Johan Norberg Del 1 Del 2 Del 3



SvD Ett hjärta rött

05 December 2007

Nyliberal is Good!

Jag läste som vanligt nyliberalen Johan Norbergs nyliberala blogg om "Jonssonaffären" när jag såg något som fick mig att tappa min nyliberala haka;

"Såvitt jag kan se har däremot inte en enda person från vänster skrivit en enda rad om mitt svar till Jonsson - om man inte räknar Kurt G Rantzén, en parodi på en liberal blogg gjord av någon vänsternisse som faktiskt lyckas vara riktigt kul på ett sätt - i olika diskussionforum får han ofta andra vänster- debattörer att tro att han är en verklig liberal, vilket säger allt om deras förutfattade meningar om vad vi tycker. (Någon borde faktiskt dokumentera hur ofta det händer och sammanställa.)"


Herregud, finns det vänsterdebattörer som utger sig för att vara verkliga nyliberaler?! Det var det nesligaste tilltag jag någonsin varit med om!

(Hmm, det här påminner om något...)


Dn1 Dn2 SvD SvD2 louisp ingerö $vensson

27 November 2007

Global Warming Saves Lives!

Johan Norberg: COLD IS THE WORST KILLER:
"The big story in Dagens Nyheter today is that thousands of Swedes will die every year because of higher temperatures. That´s correct, but shouldn´t they also write about the thousands of deaths from cold that will be avoided?

As Bjørn Lomborg points out in his new book Cool it! (now in Swedish) each year 200,000 Europeans die each year because from excess heat, but many more - 1.5 million - die from excess cold. In the UK an increase in temperature by 2 degrees will probably result in another 2,000 deaths from heat, but in 20,000 fewer deaths from cold."


Global warming is a nice bi-product of economic growth and should be seen as a blessing rather than something to fear! I mean who doesnt want a warmer climate?

In these cold wintry times im sure a lot of scandinavians would welcome a little global warming and think about how it would prevent a lot of broken bones in the ski slopes, frozen fingers plus lower heating costs!

Global warming is Good!

21 November 2007

The Poor is Rich!

Johan Norberg;"The neo-protectionists in the US are actually correct: The American middle-class is slowly disappearing in the era of globalisation. The share of households with a middle-class income between $35,000 and $75,000 shrank from 33.8 to 32.8 percent.

"But it´s not because they become poorer, it´s because they become richer, as Dan Griswold points out in a new study."

Yes, it´s a pity that people doesnt read more propaganda from oilfunded think-tanks like The Cato Institute but rather allow themselves to be fed crap like this by the secular-progressive leftist media;

ABC NEWS; Welfare is a Bad Word, but Poverty Keeps Growing
"Opportunity 08 takes a closer look at poverty, and how the next president should address the growing gap between the rich and poor in a way that satisfies all Americans."

10 November 2007

Globaliseringsrådet is Johan Norberg III

ETC;
"Salen var smockfull på ABF-huset i Stockholm. Förväntningarna höga. En debattduell skulle utspelas mellan Johan Norberg – nyliberal ekonom och författare till Globaliseringsrådets första rapport – och Johan Ehrenberg, socialist och en av författarna till Ekonomihandboken."

Lyssna på globaliseringsduellen:









Globaliseringsrådet is Johan Norberg Del I Del II

15 October 2007

Globaliseringsrådet is Johan Norberg

Är globalisering bra eller dåligt? Det har globaliseringsrådet frågat sig fem gånger under ett halvår, tills de gav upp och istället lät min guru, den högst opartiske globaliseringsexperten Johan Norberg ta över och göra en "fair and balanced(pdf)" uppskattning av läget.

Globaliseringsrådet (dvs Johan Norberg) har kommit fram till att globalisering är skitbra och kommer att göra, bara vi håller vår konsumtion uppe och utflyttning av företag till u-länder, att dessa u-länder snart att ha lika hög BNP och konsumera lika mycket som vi gör i väst, utan att vi här på något sätt behöver göra avkall på våra allt mer luxiösa vanor.

Ökad BNP är naturligtvis den indikator man ska använda när man mäter fattigdomsminskning, det ser man ju i USA och Kina där alla numera är rika och fattigdom inte längre existerar.

Globalisering leder till avregleringar av ekonomin - att den sen inte leder till ökad demokrati kan man strunta i eftersom folk i allmänhet tror att "a free market" är detsamma som ett fritt demokratiskt sa
mhälle. Och får man ändå frågan kan man ju alltid säga att det tar lite tid innan de positiva effekterna slår igenom (100 år ungefär)

Och eftersom jorden har outsinliga naturresureser, kommer priset på dessa råvaror bara minska i takt med att utvinningen av uran, kol, olja och mineraler, skogsavverkning och efterfrågan på dessa ökar.

Så att oroa sig för att naturesurser ska ta slut, "peak oil" eller att öknar skulle breda ut sig där det tidigare var regnskog är bara fånig alarmism.

Sen är det viktigt att underklassen vänjer sig att bli mer "flexibla" med sin anställningstrygghet och mer "anpassningsbara" till en ökad lönekonkurrens med u-länder.

Globalisering is Good
!

Dn

23 March 2007

Cato is Good!

Johan Norberg has finally decided to become the US corporate tank-thinker he always was, he announces;

"The Cato Institute in Washington DC is my favourite think tank.
So I am happy to announce that I am joining the Cato Institute as a Senior Fellow."



Andra bloggar om: , , ,

15 March 2007

Unions and Salary

So how come there is growing economic inequality in the US?

"Too many workers in the U.S. still can’t adequately provide basic necessities for their families, protect themselves from workplace hazards or take care of themselves when they get old or sick.

The firings, intimidation and harassment that often befall workers attempting to exercise freedoms of speech and association by forming unions are threats to our democracy.

When faced with union organizing drives, 30 percent of employers terminate pro-union workers, 40 percent threaten to close a worksite if a union prevails and 51 percent coerce workers into opposing unions with bribery and favoritism.


The motives behind assailing organized workers are both financial and ideological. Union-busting is big business."


"57 million men and women would like to have a union in their workplace for a chance to secure fair wages, affordable health care, improved working conditions, and better rights on the job. So why don't these workers have the basic protections of a union?

It's time the truth got out. Anti-union organizations and for-profit 'unionbusting' consultants have greatly contributed to workers experiencing enormous obstacles when trying to form unions. The rise of these groups over the last few decades, their multi-million dollar budgets, and their escalating attacks are no coincidence: it's the result of a decades-long plan from right-wing ideologues bent on dismantling labor organizations responsible for advancing the social and economic interests of America's workers."


Ja, usch för fackföreningar som håller lönerna uppe i Sverige..;











.. vi vill ha det som i USA;












Andra bloggar om: , , , , , ,

But Facts are ...

Johan Norberg denies that there is growing poverty in the US and says that people who claim there is are paranoid and part of the problem.

And I couldnt agree more. Its the people claiming that globalization would somehow increase income gaps and economical inequality that are making people poorer, not neoliberal free trade, and these critics should be arrested and sent to Gitmo! It should be criminal to criticize neo-liberal globalization!

People saying things like these;

"The percentage of poor Americans who are living in severe poverty has reached a 32-year high, millions of working Americans are falling closer to the poverty line and the gulf between the nation's "haves" and "have-nots" continues to widen.

A McClatchy Newspapers analysis of the 2005 census figures, the latest available, found that nearly 16 million Americans are living in deep or severe poverty. A family of four with two children and an annual income of less than $9,903 - half the federal poverty line - was considered severely poor in 2005. So were individuals who made less than $5,080 a year.

He also calls it "trade union agitation". Yes trade unions are bad and destroying free trade, just look how bad the Swedish economy has suffered because of strong trade unions under the socialdemocrats and trade unions will surely destroy the Chinese economy as well, despite all attempts to fight it.

Multinational corporations are the ones who should decide how much they want to pay in salary, not the workers, the state or any silly human rights activists!

Workers organized in terrorist "unions" are hurting the profit of these multinationals and also my personal investments making my stocks fall.

So Johan Norberg and Dick Cheney are right in lobbying against trade unions and "fair trade" just as right as with global warming...

Andra bloggar om: , , , , , ,

Intressant

05 March 2007

Freedom Index is Good!

I wrote earlier about the Heritage Foundations "Freedom Index" but i thought i´d´take another look at it since it seem to be the central of all things neoliberal.

There was particularly two "Freedoms" that caught my attention;
"Freedom from Government" and "Labor Freedom".

Here is the "Freedom from Government" Top 8;

1. Guatemala
2. Haiti
3. El Salvador
4. Guinea
5. Costa Rica
6. Peru
7. Hong Kong
8. Armenia

And the "Labor Freedom" Top 8;

1. Georgia
2. Singapore
3. Uganda
4. Hong Kong
5. Australia
6. Saudi Arabia
7. United States
8. Thailand

All extremely "free" countries indeed!

When I clicked through these links I couldnt help to notice that the names of the links didnt match the names of the particular "Freedom" so for example clicking on "Fiscal Freedom" it said "Fiscal Burden" and so on.

Here is the list;
Business Freedom = Regulation
Fiscal Freedom = Fiscal Burden
Freedom from Government = Government Intervention
Monetary Freedom = Monetary Policy
Investment Freedom = Foreign Investment
Financial Freedom = Banking
Labor Freedom = Wages and Prices
Freedom from Corruption = Informal Market

And I thought that was strange...
Corruption is called "Informal Market". Now the wikipedia definition of "Informal Market" is the following;

Informal market

"In economics, the term informal economy refers to the general market income category (or sector) wherein certain types of income and the means of their generation are "unregulated by the institutions of society, in a legal and social environment in which similar activities are regulated."

Simply put, it is economic activity that is neither taxed nor monitored by a government; and is not included in that government's Gross National Product (GNP); as opposed to a formal economy"

Now since the Heritage Foundation only seem to define the lack of laws and regulations imposed on foreign investment by a elected or nonelected government a "freedom", then the very idea of democratic freedom, as in an elected government, is completely irrelevant.

The democratic status of a nation is of no interest, what is interesting is the freedom from "Government Intervention" in your "Foreign Investment" and the ideal "Freedom from Government" would be an "Informal Market" because it completely free from "Government Intervention"

So as i´ve said before corruption is good! Now where can I find the biggest "informal markets" in the world?

"In transition countries by far the largest informal economy was in Georgia with 67.3%"

Now what a coincidence thats number one in the world in "Labor Freedom"

And a statment about China I found interesting was this;

"The informal market must be allowed to flourish, he said. Returns in the informal market are high versus low in the formal sector. This explains why, despite Chinas poor legal and financial structures, it has sustained growth. Informal financing and government arrangements are effective. The fact is that agreements work under the common goal of profit sharing.
The Chinese authority has something to learn from informal arrangements. Its best to allow the informal market to quietly work wonders."
- Khalid Mirza - World Bank manager of finance and private sector development in East Asia and the Pacific region


More;

"Money laundering within China's shadow economy is estimated by some analysts to be the equivalent of 2 to 5 percent of GDP. That would be a staggering $68 billion per year leaking out of the country, although such a sum is hard to verify.

The tax-avoiding black economy is far bigger, running at more than 15 percent of GDP, according to Professor Friedrich Schneider, author of "The Shadow Economy: An International Survey,""

So what the World Bank manager of finance actually says to the chinese government is "dont mess with the Hong Kong money laundering operations".

Another country with very big shadow economy is the US;

"Marijuana, pornography and illegal labour have created a hidden market in the United States which now accounts for as much as 10% of the American economy, according to a study. As a cash crop, marijuana is believed to have outstripped maize, and hardcore porn revenue is equal to Hollywood's domestic box office takings."

Corruption is good! The bad news is that the chinese government is trying to fight it as well as now is calling for a fairer, greener economy...

Update; I saw that Sweden is number one in paying bribes in the world
" The index ranks the leading exporting countries in terms of the degree to which their companies are perceived to be paying bribes. The scale is from 0 to 10, where 10 represents negligible bribery and 0 a very high level of bribery. Based on a survey of nearly 800 business executives conducted in 14 emerging-market countries."


Johan is God!

Johan Norberg försvarar amerikanska multinationella företag mot diktaturkramaren Mikael Wiehe igen för hans inlägg i Dagens Nyheter och då måste man ju som nyliberal agitator vars hela världsbild är helt beroende av Johan Norberg också falla in i ledet och vara med på en ny koordinerad attack mot sveriges "axis of evil";

Allesammans nu;

Fy Mikael Fy!!


(Man kan hitta Kuba på nummer 50 på FNs Human Development Index 2006)

28 February 2007

Golden Shield is Good!

Johan Norbergs blogg är tydligen censurerad i Kina. Undrar vilket företag som hjälpte till med installationen? Det måste ha blivit nåt fel??!

Sånt hade aldrig hänt i Sverige!

---

Apropå Johan Norberg så lyssnade jag på en intervju där den Heritage Foundation-hyllade nyliberale hjälten målade upp den sköna nya världen som kommer att infinna sig så snart kapitalismen nått varenda lilla hörn av världen och varje sandkorn och vattenmolekyl på jorden är privatiserad. Han fick också några tuffa frågor som han tacklade på ett underbart magiskt sätt;

“It is correct that the wealth of the world is very unevenly distributed… the reason why it is unevenly distributed is that there is an uneven distribution of capitalism [..] The problem of the world today is too little globalization and too little capitalism.”


Det är ju bara att se på USA, kapitalismens Mecka. Där är ju klyftorna avsevärt mycket mindre än i socialistiska länder som Kuba.

Men i Kina däremot, där minskar ju de ekonomiska klyftorna
i takt med frihandelns frihetskorståg drar över världen...




23 January 2007

ExxonMobil is Good!

I must commend ExxonMobil for their hard work and financial support to organizations like Atlas Economic Research Foundation, who awarded Johan Norberg the distinguished Antony Fisher International Memorial Award for "Defense of Global Capitalism", as well as their generous donations to the Cato intitute who is publishing it in the US.

They also makes valuble finacial contributions to the Heritage Foundation, who publishes works of JohnnyMunkhammar .

Not to mention their loyal support of George Bush and the republican party in a crucial election and their valuble contributions to scientific research countering extremist leftist propaganda.

Im happy to see that swedish thinktanks like Timbro, Captus and publications like NEO are spreading the truth to the swedish population

22 January 2007

Bribes are Good!

"SHANGHAI: The police have detained 22 people in a bribery investigation here that has ensnared some of the world's biggest companies, including McDonald's, Whirlpool, McKinsey & Co. and ABB, state-run news media reported Friday."

I dont understand why completely normal business arrangement are considered illegal? The state shouldnt dictate how to run a business, that is best kept in the hands of the corporations themselves.

This is clearly an attack on free enterprise!

And as Johan Norberg points out corporations can be trusted a lot more than governments;

"... an Edelman survey of 3 100 opinion leaders in 18 countries show that corporations gain in popularity and that businesses are now more trusted than governments in every continent."

Although the quoted PR firm Edelman actually said;

"The survey of 3,100 "opinion leaders" in 18 countries by the public relations firm Edelman suggests that corporate governance reforms and the rising wealth of individuals in many developing nations are helping the corporate sector to improve its credibility."

Johan Norberg also fails to mention that;
"
NGOs (non-governmental organisations) beat business to the top spot in North America and Europe, with most respondents ranking them as the most trusted institution"

Which is very good news for oilfunded thinktanks who shaped the successful oil liberation in Iraq and organizations of scientists who tell the truth about the nonexistent "climate change".